Prosecutors Book Beating – Griesbach can’t figure out it’s because he puts in False Facts

 

 

Michael Griesbach can’t grasp what he was told at the beginning the middle and the end. The objection to his book was in the altering of evidence in the book, changing crucial facts and in other ways misleading his readers. When the film came out and the transcripts were read the discrepancies were found but while acknowledging the major errors he did nothing to correct them or warn his readers. A book by a prosecutor in the case published by the American Bar Association would be assumed to be fact checked. A very dangerous precedent indeed, as readers are basing their opinions on false facts they would be confident were true..

Michael Griesbach can’t grasp what he was told in the beginning the middle and the end. The objection to his book was in the altering of  evidence in the book, changing crucial facts. and in other ways misleading his readers. When the film came out and the transcripts were read the discrepancies were found but while acknowledging the major errors he did nothing to correct them or warn his readers. A book by a prosecutor in the case published by the American would  be assumed to be fact checked. A very dangerous precedent indeed, as reader would be basing their opinions on false facts they would be confident were true.

Comments

comments

It's only fair to share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestEmail this to someone